Above: Amanda Knox's devious mischievous smile during trial
If you've studied the infamous and controversial Amanda Knox true crime case, involving her and her boyfriend Raffaele Sollecito's public trial, incarceration and acquittal for the murder of her roommate Meredith Kercher, you may confused because the evidence doesn't stack up and seems conflicting and confusing. However, if you weigh all the evidence and arguments on both sides, the evidence and case for her guilt seems stronger than her innocence. This suggests that she was at least involved in the murder at some level, even if she didn't commit the murder herself. See the Murder of Meredith Kercher Wiki Site.
Since researching this case is time consuming, I thought I'd help you out, if you're interested, by posting the best summary lists of the case for her guilt or involvement that I found and collected from YouTube comment sections and other sites written by true crime buffs. They will give you an idea of the big picture and see what I mean. Keep in mind that while each piece of evidence individually can be explained away with alternate theories, when added up cumulatively it paints a very strong big picture of guilt, hence the preponderance of evidence definitely points to her guilt or involvement in the crime. This is what the pro-innocence crowd that defend Knox doesn't understand or consider. They nitpick and cherry pick flaws in the prosecution case due to their biases, but don't look at the big picture.