Share This Page

Friday, April 4, 2014

Why Women Are NOT Smarter Than Men and should not rule the world, contrary to what the US media wants

Above: Flag of Feminazi-ism

I've never understood some things in America. In particular these two things:

  1. Why it is that in America, you are only allowed to say that women are smarter than men, but you can't say that men are smarter than women? It seems as though America considers women to be smarter than men? On what basis? It's never been explained. 
  2. Also, women seem to be in charge of the household in American families. Husbands have to call their wife "The Boss". And the wife has the power to make her husband "sleep in the doghouse" if he behaves badly. But this goes against established tradition. For thousands of years, the man has been the head of the household. Why does America wish to overturn such a long-standing natural order? On what basis? What is liberal America's logic and rationale for this? They seem to provide none.

Let's go over both. First, if women are smarter than men, then why do men overall score HIGHER on IQ tests than women? How come there are no female equivalents of Einstein, Leonardo DaVinci, or Mozart? How come there are no great female leaders in history? (at least on the same level of great male leaders) Why do women get into car accidents more than men do? Why are men better at investing than women? How come they always suck at chess and hate the game (except for Russian and Slavic women)? Why do women hate logic and even admit it? Smart people do not hate logic. It seems the female brain is just not hardwired for logic.

Given the above, how can women be smarter than men? Therefore, this "women are smarter than men" rule seems to be a religious doctrine in America that's treated as a given, without any justification or logic. Kind of like how Christians claim that the Bible is God's word and absolutely inerrant, as a given, without logical justification. Their only rationale is that "if everyone says it, it must be true, no matter how nonsensical".

Such bizarre beliefs seem to be a religion in America without any logical justification. Bad beliefs like this have always been signs of social decay that brought down empires as great as the Roman Empire. I wish America would heed this history lesson.

The truth is, men and women are different. They are smart in different ways and good at different things. Women are smarter at certain things like fashion, interior design, cooking, raising babies, etc. But men are smarter in other things. Men are more logical, while women are more intuitive. Men are natural conquerors, pioneers and explorers, while women are better nurturers. Men are better in creative and intellectual pursuits, inventions, and leadership roles. But women prefer to conform and follow. They are nurturers who provide support, love and companionship to supplement the emotional needs of their man.

Everyone knows these things. They are all too obvious. Why can't liberals and feminists accept this reality that men and women are different and suited for different things? What's wrong with them? Instead, they resort to lies. For example, feminists claim that women can do anything that men can do. But if that's so, then:

  • How come 99 percent of all major accomplishments and inventions in the world were done by men? All women can accomplish better is getting more likes on Facebook. lol
  • How come every time I get my car's oil changed, it's always a man doing it? Never a woman?
  • How come when I get a car fixed, it's always a man doing it?
  • How come when I see construction workers working outside, they are always men? Why aren't women building houses too?
  • How come when I call the plumber, it's always a man that comes?
  • How come when there is a strange sound in the dark outside, women always want men to check it out? Why don't they check it out themselves?
  • How come there has never been a great female general that has won great military battles against all odds, such as Napoleon's masterful victory at the Battle of Austerlitz? Or Alexander the Great's epic victory at the Battle of Gautemala against a Persian army 4 or 5 times the size of his?
  • How come great inventors, painters, and composers throughout history have always been men? Where are the female Mozarts, DaVincis and Einsteins?
  • How come professional sports divide men and women into different leagues? Even pro tennis is divided by gender. If men and women were the same, why aren't they playing together on the same teams? Why aren't football teams co-ed?
  • Why aren't women going into front lines in battle in the army?
  • Why don't women run into burning buildings to try to save lives?

So you see, equality does not mean that men and women are the same. Feminists can't answer or address the questions above. They are totally out of touch with reality and logic, and are either dishonest or delusional. There's no way around it.

All they care about is their hatred for men, and all they see everywhere is the word "misogyny" in everything, which they use as a broad brush to smear everything and everyone they don't like. But it's mostly all in their delusional twisted hate-filled heads.

Also, women are not natural born leaders. They are not suited for leadership roles. Very very few women in history have been good leaders. Mother Nature did not hardwire women to be leaders. Sorry to all the politically correct liberals out there, but that's the truth.

There has never been a great female general in history that has won great battles against all odds, such as Napoleon's masterful victory at the Battle of Austerlitz. Or Alexander the Great's epic victory at the Battle of Gautemala against a Persian army 4 or 5 times the size of his. Women just aren't good at that sort of thing. In fact, they tend to screw up in military strategy.

For example, Queen Cleopatra, the last Pharaoh of Egypt, screwed up her lover Marc Anthony's battle strategy at the Battle of Actium against Caesar Augustus, by giving him bad advice. She persuaded him to fight the battle by sea instead of by land, as his officers wanted. By listening to her, he lost that crucial and pivotal battle. If he had listened to his officers instead, he might have won that battle. So much for female advice on military strategy.

Women tend to be followers and conformists by nature. They care more about what others think and are more affected by popular trends than men are. This is why advertisers and commercials tend to target women more than men, because women are more easily influenceable and programmable due to their nature as followers and conformists. They have no deep inner convictions and principles, and do not think for themselves. To them, truth is determined by whatever is popular and whatever the majority believe, not by reason and logic. These things are obvious. Hence, these traits of women make them better followers than leaders.

What I don't get is why Hollywood tries to portray women as leaders nowadays. Even in action movies, like Resident Evil, the ones in charge are often women. Is Hollywood that stupid, or are they trying to turn everything upside down as part of a nefarious agenda? In the last Snow White movie, for example, they had Kristen Stewart, who played Snow White, lead a military raid on a castle, which was stupid, insulting, unfeminine, nonsensical and out of character for Snow White. Also, when men and women argue, Hollywood always shows the women winning, and when they compete in a board game or sports game, they always have to show the female winning. Why is that, given the fact that in real life, men usually win in such competitions? Why does Hollywood like to show the opposite of what's true?

How do feminists and liberals explain all this? They can't. They are totally out of touch with reality and logic. All they care about is their hatred for men, and all they see everywhere is the word "misogyny" in everything, which they use as a broad brush to smear everything and everyone they don't like. But it's mostly all in their delusional twisted hate-filled heads.

I guess liberals and feminists would argue that women are more mature at an earlier age, and do not start wars like men do. So they are smarter and wiser in that sense. Ok that's a valid point. But it doesn't account for all the above, which indicates that women are not suited for leadership roles, and do not like logic either, but find it boring. Nor does it account for women's immature behavior. For example, women cry and get more emotional suddenly, more than men do. And American women are notorious for starting arguments over trivial things (which men detest) to spice up the drama in their life. It's as if they do not enjoy peace, so if things are too peaceful, they cause trouble by starting arguments and conflicts over unnecessary matters. Hence they are reputed to be "drama queens". This is not mature behavior.

Another thing they'd try to argue is that the reason there are no great female leaders, generals, artists, composers or inventors in history is because women have always been too oppressed to be given opportunity to become such things, or be recognized for their talents and achievements. But this is just a copout. It doesn't explain why there are no such great women in modern America today, where they supposedly have "equal rights" and preferential treatment. Nor does it recognize the fundamental differences between men and women.

Anyhow, continuing on, if women are not naturally suited for leadership roles, then WHY are they considered the head of household in America? Why does an American husband call his wife "The Boss"? If women are not smarter than men, then how can they be "The Boss"? Shouldn't a boss or head of household be smarter and wiser than the rest of the household? How can all this be, when women are nurturers by nature, not leaders? It doesn't make any sense. Liberal America doesn't make sense. It's purely emotional and argumentative, without reason or logic. Stuff like this can only mean that America is majorly F-ed up big time.

For thousands of years, men have been the head of the household and family. Why does America think that it can overturn all this and call it "progress and enlightenment" of culture? What is America smoking? Fucking things up is NOT progressive. Why is America screwing with Mother Nature by trying to reverse the natural gender roles of human beings? America appears to be batshit insane, not only in this area, but in many others as well.

Anyway, sorry for the long rant and grip against liberalism and feminism. I'm just so fed up with how illogical, hypocritical, warped, unnatural, toxic and destructive their ideologies are. They are clearly bringing America down into a moral decay, and are trying to bring down other countries as well, which has got to be stopped.


  1. It's because American men have turned into a bunch of pussies and due to their hunger for overpriced vagina (plus the well organized man hating "equal rights" feminists), they have let women take over this country. That's one of the reasons the USA is in such chaos now. Women are incapable of logic thought. Instead, the work off their emotions. Yes men ARE better and smarter than women, but don't try to tell the women that

  2. I agree with much of what is on your website, but not this. Women are highly literate and have better communication skills than men. Men are generally superior at jobs such as drafting and architecture, because their brains can fill in the blanks where women's brains lack that capability. Communicating effectively takes as much skill and intelligence as computer programming. After reading some of the interesting topics here, this was quite a let-down.

  3. When I meet a woman who can do HALF of what I do on a technical level, I will be impressed. Sorry, but women are NOT my equal.

  4. No, this isn't quite right, and is in fact misogynistic. Men and women are equals in the sense of being equally human. The human brain manifests itself in an infinite amount of ways, and not all general sex characteristics always apply.

    While I think American culture has let the pendulum fly way too far to the female gender, I think it is a failing attempt at bringing egalitarianism to our society.

  5. I ask - How can Men and WoMen be equal when there are only two days in the
    year when the Night and Day are equal in length.
    The creator did not evem make Might and day equal on a continuing basis.

    Many non-Muslims feel sorry for any Muslim women they see adorned in their
    modest clothing. They feel that they are deprived the freedom to roam around
    in more scant and revealing clothing. Anyone who lives in a manner other that
    which they have become accustomed to is seen by them to be oppressed and
    forced to live in this manner.

    There are certain tribes in the Amazon jungle and in Africa which have become
    accustomed to walking around in a simple g-string around their waist.
    What would the people of the West say if these people were to condemn the
    Western habit of “forcing” their WoMen to wear “excessive amounts of clothing”
    and to demand that all WoMen in the West immediately stop wearing anything
    but the simplest g-string around their waist?

    What if they were to say that the Western society should immediately stop
    unjustly persecuting their WoMen and preventing them from freely roaming the
    streets wearing only a pair of socks? They would say that the people making
    these demands have no morals or shame.
    Philosophers would have a field day with such a question.

    What if someone were to claim that it was immoral - discriminatory - and
    unjust to separate Men and WoMen in different public bathrooms just as it\
    is not just to do so with blacks and whites.
    What if this PERSON were to then call (in the interest of equality - fairness
    - and constitutional freedom of course) for a merging of Men and WoMen’s
    bathrooms into one “unisex” or “equal-opportunity” bathrooms for both Men and
    WoMenn? Once again - the philosophers would have a field day
    Anyone who follows the news will see that this may indeed be where the USA
    is now headed.
    In the New York Post (31 Aug. 1994 or a little before) it is reported that
    WoMen have now won the right to appear topless in the New York subway system.
    Where will the USA be a few years from now? That is anyone’s guess.

  6. Who has the power to determine what is decent and modest clothing?
    Who is to determine what is decent and modest behavior?
    Mu'Slims assign this right to God alone.
    This is the essence of “iSlaM.” “iSLaM” means “The submission to the will of God.”
    What God commands a Mu'Slim does. They do not demand that God justify his
    commands before they accept them. Once they have verified that a command
    is indeed from God then they abide by it without hesitation.
    Well then - what is the Biblical view on these matters?

    For all those people who would like to see what the Bible has to say about
    WoMen - we will quote a small sample:

    What St. Paul’s “new covenant” has to say:
    1 Timothy 2:11-14
    “Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection.
    But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but
    to be in silence. For Adam was first formed, then Eve.
    And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression.”

    _ And North Americans claim that the USA is a Christian Country?
    Well - it never has been - And the so-called Christians break all the rules.

    1 Corinthians 14:34
    “Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto
    them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience as also saith
    the law. And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home:
    for it is a shame for women to speak in the church.”

    1 Corinthians 11:5-10:
    “But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered
    dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven.
    For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be a
    shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered.
    For a man indeed ought not to cover his head, forasmuch as he is the image
    and glory of God: but the woman is the glory of the man.
    For the man is not of the woman: but the woman of the man.
    Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man.
    For this cause ought the woman to have power on her head because of the angels.”

    1 Corinthians 11:13:
    “Judge in yourselves: is it comely that a woman pray unto God
    (with her head) uncovered?”

    In other words, the Bible teaches us that:
    1) Women should learn in silence and subjugation.
    2) Women should not teach.
    3) Women should not have authority over men but should remain silent.
    4) Adam and Eve were not equal in sin. Adam was not deceived but Eve was.
    5) Women must keep silent in Churches and not open their mouths.
    6) Women are commanded to be under obedience to men.
    7) Women should not ask a question in Church.
    If they have a question they should ask their husbands before going
    to church and then their husbands will ask for them in the church.

  7. You make many good points, and are brave to speak-up, as feminists have duped the Western world, and persecute those who show feminists lies.

    Your claim about Christians belief in the Bible is mistaken,
    "Kind of like how Christians claim that the Bible is God's word and absolutely inerrant, as a given, without logical justification. Their only rationale is that "if everyone says it, it must be true, no matter how nonsensical."

    I don't know any Christians whose belief in the Bible is without justification.
    I doubt you know any either, but have made a straw-man argument here.

  8. It's a great discussion. Sorry for my not very good English, but what I think is that for some reason ladies got too much of the loose in US and European cultures and got the idea that they can be superior to guys. And they use it to get an advantage. What is the man in US culture now (in terms of man/woman relationship)? Just someone who earns money. And the woman is the one who decides how to spend them.
    Insane. Unthinkable scenario some 40 years ago. What has changed in genetical differences between men and women in those 40 years? I bet nothing, nothing noticable to justify that shift US cultutre pushes for to humiliate the men kind and raise the women kind. One of the subjects brought up in this thread: Hollywood portraying of women as physically superior to men in some movies, it's just a BS, how women could even theoretically be stronger than men? Not taking into account some deviations of mother nature giving frailty to some men and excessive strength to some women?
    The author of this article said: "Bad beliefs like this have always been signs of social decay that brought down empires as great as the Roman Empire". I'm very scared that this is true. I moved from Russia to Canada many years ago hoping I wuill find a better place to live here, but now I'm not sure I was totally right at that point of time, when I saw and experienced the shear force of feminism dominating here.
    Who will benefit from degrading the men and hailing the women? I think it will be just a temporary glee of womenkind and then, when they will face the consequences, when they'll see that women by themselves will not be able to accomplish any significant task that requires intelligence and logical approach, when they will see they succumb to nations not professing feminism and still relying on men's dominance, and surpassing them in technology and everything else that underlies nation's dominance, they will turn to men again blaming them they allowed women to take over and that's all men's fault. They always blame men. They are always innocent, because they do not have enough of intelligence to bear the responsibility.


Please do not leave spam or advertising junk on this blog!